legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Calhoun
Defendant Johanis Calhoun was convicted by a jury of two counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211) and one count of burglary (id. 459) in connection with the armed robbery of a convenience store. (Further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.) The jury also found defendant personally used a firearm in connection with each of the offenses ( 12022.5, subd. (a)(1), 12022.53, subd. (b)). He was sentenced to an aggregate, unstayed term of 15 years in state prison. Defendant appeals contending: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial based on jury tampering; (2) the jury was improperly instructed on misleading statements and flight by defendant; (3) the prosecution committed misconduct in closing argument regarding the definition of reasonable doubt; (4) defense counsel provided ineffective assistance during his closing argument; and (5) the abstract of judgment misstates the offenses on which he was convicted. Court agree the abstract must be corrected but otherwise affirm the judgment.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale