legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Phu
Tim Phu appeals from postjudgment rulings revoking his probation and ordering execution of a previously stayed seven-year state prison sentence, contending the court abused its discretion in declining to reinstate probation. In a supplemental brief Phu also argues he is entitled to additional presentence custody credit pursuant to Penal Code section 2900.5, subdivision (b), for time actually spent in a residential treatment facility as a condition of his probation. Court affirm the rulings revoking probation and ordering execution of the previously stayed sentence, but remand for recalculation of presentence custody credits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale