Marriage of Shustak
In this marital dissolution proceeding Erwin J. Shustak, an attorney, appeals from a judgment entered after a trial asserting (1) the court failed to rule on his entitlement to credits for loan reimbursements and reduced retroactive spousal support; and (2) the court erred in refusing to grant Erwin[1] relief under Code of Civil Procedure[2] section 473, subdivision (b) (section 473(b)), based upon an alleged mistake of fact and law, from a stipulation that he entered into on the first day of trial which confirmed that several stock accounts were his wife Andrea's separate property. Court affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Shustak