In re R.D.
D.D. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her daughter, R.D. Appellants appointed appellate counsel submitted a letter dated November 5, 2008, advising that he would not be filing an opening brief for lack of an arguable issue pursuant to In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952. Court extended time for appellant to personally file a letter brief which she since has done.
Court conclude appellants accusations do not amount to claims that the superior court committed an error affecting the outcome of this case (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994) and will affirm.
Comments on In re R.D.