legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hallett
In a prior opinion, we remanded this case for resentencing because the trial court erred by failing to state the basis for its decision to impose the upper term sentence as required by rule 4.420(e) of the California Rules of Court. (People v. Hallett (Aug. 29, 2007, G037505) [nonpub. opn.].) On remand, the trial court selected the upper term sentence, citing defendant Richard Leroy Halletts prior prison terms as the basis for imposing an upper term sentence. The record is not sufficient to support the trial courts determination defendant served a prior prison term other than the one alleged in the charging document and admitted by defendant, and for which the trial court imposed a one year consecutive enhancement sentence. Court therefore again remand to the trial court for resentencing.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale