P. v. Peraza-Williams
Defendant Vilma Peraza Williams appeals from a conviction of one count of forgery (Pen. Code, 470, subd. (a)) and one count of perjury ( 118, subd. (a)). She contends that substantial evidence does not support her forgery conviction. She also challenges her perjury conviction, arguing that it is invalid because the jury acquitted her of another, similar, perjury charge. Court disagree and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Peraza-Williams