In re J.R.
M.R. (hereafter mother) appeals from the trial courts order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 terminating her parental rights to her son, J.R.[1] Mother asserts only one claim in this appealthat J.R.s first name was misspelled on some of the notices sent pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.; hereafter ICWA), and as a result the trial courts finding that ICWA does not apply in this case is not supported by substantial evidence. There are numerous defects in mothers claim, not the least of which is that she did not timely challenge the ICWA finding, and therefore has not preserved the issue for review on appeal. As a result, Court affirm the order terminating mothers parental rights.
Comments on In re J.R.