legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.M.
A.W. appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her daughters, D.M. and T.G., and ordering the children placed for adoption. She contends that termination of her parental rights was foreclosed by operation of Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i), the so called beneficial parental relationship exception, because the amount and quality of visitation she was afforded was inappropriately limited.
To the extent that A.W.s contentions were previously determined in prior proceedings in this court, they are governed by law of the case. As to any issues not previously addressed in appellate proceedings, review is forfeited by A.W.s failure to raise them in the section 366.26 hearing. Consequently, Court affirm the judgment.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale