legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Wanless v. Superior Court
In this matter we have reviewed the petition and the responses thereto. We have determined that resolution of the matter involves the application of settled principles of law, and furthermore that issuance of an alternative writ of mandate would cause undue delay in resolving the matter. We therefore issue a peremptory writ in the first instance. (Code Civ. Proc., 1088; Palmav.U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 178-179; Alexanderv.Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 1218, 1222-1223.)First, we find that Judge Randall White properly struck petitioners statement challenging him for cause. The judges prior rulings do not constitute a valid basis for disqualification.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale