Enpalm v. Yadegar
Plaintiffs and appellants Enpalm LLC and Pico 26 LLC appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants and respondents Fred and Simin Yadegar (the Yadegars) in an unlawful detainer action filed by appellants. The trial court ruled that the Yadegars were not in violation of their long-term lease and had a right to remain on the property. Appellants contend that this result was barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, arguing that the term of the Yadegars tenancy was litigated in a prior action and found to be month to month. Court affirm.
Comments on Enpalm v. Yadegar