legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wynne
On May 25, 2007, an amended information charged defendant and appellant Richard Allen Wynne with second degree robbery under Penal Code section 211.[1] The information also alleged that the robbery was committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang under section 186.22, subdivision (b). The information further alleged that defendant had a strike prior under sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i), and 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d), and a prison prior under section 667.5, subdivision (a). On appeal, defendant contends that there is insufficient evidence to prove that he violated terms of his probation and that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his probation. For the reasons set forth below, Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale