legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.M.
Appellant D.M. (born 1991) was adjudged a ward of the court after the juvenile court found true the allegations that he committed count I, felony assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code,[1] 245, subd. (a)(1)) with a gang enhancement ( 186.22, subd. (b)(1)), and count III, misdemeanor battery ( 242). On appeal, he contends the testimony of the prosecutions gang expert lacked sufficient foundation because it was based on speculation and unreliable hearsay. He further asserts the gang enhancement is not supported by substantial evidence because the prosecution failed to prove appellants membership in a specific gang, and that the primary activities of such a gang were the criminal offenses enumerated by statute. Finally, he contends the gang enhancement must be stricken because of a pleading error in the juvenile petition. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale