legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gonzalez
A jury convicted defendant Efren Nieves Gonzalez of possession of a destructive device in a public place (Pen. Code, 12303.2)[1] possession of a destructive device ( 12303), and possession of drug paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code 11364, subd. (a)). Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting statements in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda), erred in admitting defendants adoptive admission (Evid. Code, 1221), erred by instructing the jury with Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions CALCRIM No. 224 concerning the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence, and erred by denying defendants motion for mistrial or sanctions premised on the prosecutions late disclosure of evidence. ( 1054, subd. (b); Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 (Brady).) For the reasons expressed below, Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale