Benefield v. Ca. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Appellant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) appeals from the trial courts judgment ordering it to dismiss adverse actions against respondents Ronald Sphar and Robert Martin, and to reinstate them to their employment. CDCR asserts that the trial court erroneously concluded that CDCR violated the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA) because the notices of adverse action served on Martin and Sphar bore the signature of someone other than the person who had decided on the level of discipline. Court conclude that the trial courts judgment is not supported by substantial evidence, and we reverse.
Comments on Benefield v. Ca. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation