M.R. v. Superior Court
Mother M. R. seeks review of the juvenile courts order terminating family reunification services and setting a selection and implementation hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. She contends the juvenile court erred in finding she was provided reasonable reunification services and in denying an extension of those services. Mother also claims a conflict of interest by the attorney representing six of the children constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.Substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts conclusion that mother was offered reasonable services. The court did not abuse its discretion in declining to extend services for an additional six months. Mother failed to raise an objection to counsel for the minors in the juvenile court, and therefore failed to preserve that issue for review. Court deny mothers petition on these grounds.
Comments on M.R. v. Superior Court