legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Issac K.
In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, 300 et seq.),[1]the parents of the subject dependent minor child have appealed to challenge an order that terminated their parental rights. The parents contend the dependency court erred when it ruled they had not carried their burden of establishing that the parental relationship exception to termination of parental rights ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) applies in this case. Our review of the record convinces us that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when making its finding on the matter. Court therefore affirm the challenged order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale