P. v. Smith
Terryance Acey Smith appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of numerous offenses arising out of a series of robberies in the summer of 2005. Smith argues he received an unlawful sentence because the use of his prior nonjury juvenile adjudications as strikes under the Three Strikes law violated his federal constitutional rights. He also contends the abstract of judgment should be corrected to reflect he was convicted by a jury and not the trial court. With the exception of his abstract of judgment argument, none of Smiths contentions have merit, and Court affirm the judgment as modified.
Comments on P. v. Smith