legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Smith
Terryance Acey Smith appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of numerous offenses arising out of a series of robberies in the summer of 2005. Smith argues he received an unlawful sentence because the use of his prior nonjury juvenile adjudications as strikes under the Three Strikes law violated his federal constitutional rights. He also contends the abstract of judgment should be corrected to reflect he was convicted by a jury and not the trial court. With the exception of his abstract of judgment argument, none of Smiths contentions have merit, and Court affirm the judgment as modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale