legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ranteesi
Appellant Simon Ranteesi brutally killed Milia Ranteesi, his estranged wife, bludgeoning her to death in the presence of their children. A jury convicted him of first degree murder by use of a deadly weapon, and he was sentenced to 26 years to life in prison. On appeal, appellant makes two contentions: (1) the trial court abused its discretion when it precluded his expert witnesses from testifying as to the specific matters that formed the basis for their opinions that he suffered from delusional disorder; and (2) the trial court erred in rejecting his request that the jury be instructed on unconsciousness by involuntary intoxication because the evidence showed he was in a Paxil induced manic state when he committed the killing. Court conclude that the first contention has merit, but that the error was harmless, and that the second contention has no merit. Court therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale