P. v. Barr
Appellant Geoffrey Barr appeals from a conviction for assault with a deadly weapon -- his truck. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. He also contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte regarding the defense of necessity. Court find substantial evidence in the record to support appellants conviction, and determine that the omission of a necessity instruction was not error. Thus, we affirm the judgment. However, Court have found a clerical error in the abstract of judgment, and order that it be corrected.
Comments on P. v. Barr