In re U.R.
D.R. (Father) and A.R. (Mother) appeal from denial of their petitions under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1]and from a judgment terminating their parental rights to U.R. Mother contends the juvenile court erred in denying her section 388 petition seeking resumption of reunification services and in finding inapplicable the beneficial relationship exception to termination of parental rights. Both Mother and Father (collectively, appellants) contend the court erred in terminating their parental rights because the Solano County Health and Social Services Department (Department) failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.). Court affirm the denial of the section 388 petitions and the juvenile courts finding regarding the beneficial relationship exception, but Court reverse the judgment and remand for the limited purpose of complying with the ICWA notice requirements.
Comments on In re U.R.