legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.M.
B.H. (mother) appeals an order of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]terminating her parental rights over her son, J.M. (child). Mother argues that (1) the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition seeking the return of child to her care, and (2) the juvenile court erred in concluding that the parental relationship exception to the termination of parental rights ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(1)) did not apply. For the reasons stated below, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale