legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.W.
Appellants G.W. (father) and C.W. (mother) (collectively, parents) challenge the juvenile courts ruling summarily denying their petition to modify a court order, filed under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388.[1] The parents argue[2]the court abused its discretion when it summarily denied the petition without a hearing because the petition established a prima facie case that new evidence required a modification of the jurisdiction and disposition orders and that the modification would be in the best interest of their daughter, A.W.(child). As discussed below, Court conclude that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion when it summarily denied the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale