Holt v. Super. Ct.
According to petitioners (plaintiffs) verified petition for writ of mandate, the following issue is presented: Does an order violate the attorney work product doctrine when it compels plaintiffs attorney to evaluate, categorize and label all documents received from third parties to correspond with each of the 36 [Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.010 et seq.] requests that were the subject of the motion. Because the court did not actually order plaintiffs to do what they claim was ordered, Court deny the petition.
Comments on Holt v. Super. Ct.