Walters v. Weidman
Defendant George V. Weidman appeals from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs Katherine Walters and William Weidman based upon breach of an oral contract. George contends the jury committed misconduct in reaching a compromise verdict, the verdict is not supported by substantial evidence, and it was error to admit Katherines testimony regarding conversations that took place pursuant to a mediation. Court affirm.
Comments on Walters v. Weidman