Conservatorship of Borstein
Amiya Goswami appeals from a broad permanent injunction issued by the probate court restraining him from taking specified actions concerning assets of the late Alfred J. Borstein, Borsteins trust, and other related entities. Appellant raises multiple challenges to the injunction. He claims the probate court acted in excess of its jurisdiction because he was not served with the temporary restraining order or application for permanent injunction; he was not a party to the probate proceeding; respondents are no longer parties to the conservatorship case; respondent Carol Stein failed to present evidence of her rights to the disputed properties; and the injunction improperly resolved disputes concerning properties located in other states. Appellant also argues the trial court violated his constitutional rights by barring him from filing documents to protect his interests in the disputed properties. He contends the court erred in granting relief in this probate action that, in effect, quieted title to the disputed properties, and he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the injunction. Court find no basis for reversal and affirm.
Comments on Conservatorship of Borstein