In re J.M
J.M. appeals from an order of wardship pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 following the finding he committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211).[1] He was placed home on probation in the home of his mother, and a maximum term of confinement of five years was declared. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support the finding he committed a robbery because he was not an aider or abettor. Additionally, he asserts the court erred by setting a maximum term of confinement. For reasons stated in the opinion, Court affirm the order of wardship but strike the maximum term of confinement.
Comments on In re J.M