P. v. Saul
Defendant Jayson Nathaniel Saul pled no contest to possession of cocaine for sale. Thereafter, he wanted to withdraw his plea and substitute counsel was appointed for that purpose. After reviewing the matter, substitute counsel informed the court that she did not believe defendant had a right to withdraw his plea and no such motion was filed. Defendant proceeded to sentencing with his original counsel. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred when it appointed substitute counsel and in failing to ensure that defendant was represented by counsel in his motion to withdraw his plea. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Saul