legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gutierrez
Appellant Juan Carlos Gutierrez challenges his murder, robbery and attempted robbery convictions on the grounds the trial court committed numerous instructional errors, violated due process by imposing upper and consecutive terms on the basis of facts not found by the jury or admitted by him, and improperly imposed a gang enhancement. We conclude the trial court made several errors in relation to the aiding and abetting and accomplice instructions. However, the errors were harmless under the circumstances. The court also erred harmlessly by failing to instruct the jury upon the requirements for finding that a principal used or discharged a firearm for purposes of a Penal Code section 12022.53 enhancement. Moreover, the imposition of upper and consecutive terms did not violate due process. Finally, the trial court improperly enhanced appellants sentence under Penal Code section 186.22.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale