P. v. Guy
Defendant and appellant Domonick Guy appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of three counts of petty theft with a prior. He challenges the denial of his motions for new appointed counsel (People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden)) and for self representation (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 (Faretta)) as untimely. He also contends and the People concede that one of the convictions for petty theft with a prior must be reversed and that defendants presentence custody credits were miscalculated. We reverse one of the petty theft convictions and modify the judgment to correctly reflect the presentence custody credits to which defendant is entitled; as so modified, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Guy