P. v. Lane
This court often reviews Pitchess motions.[1] Sometimes the appeal asks that we review the trial court's refusal to conduct an in camera hearing; other times the appellant requests our review of such a hearing when the trial court has declined to order disclosure. Here, appellant Elbert Lane filed an affidavit that was found to be adequate, the trial court did conduct an in camera hearing, and disclosure of the officer's records was made. Nonetheless, Lane asks that we determine if the court went far enough. Court do; it did. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Lane