Burk v. City of Arcadia
Richard M. Burk contends that the trial court erred in granting respondent Arcadia Police Departments[1]anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) motion striking the second and fourth causes of action of his complaint. These causes of action alleged that representatives of the Department slandered Burk and damaged his career as a firefighter for Los Angeles County. The Department contends that the statements at issue were protected speech and the trial court ruled properly. Court find no error and affirm.
Comments on Burk v. City of Arcadia