In re Melanie C.
Dianna H. and Michael C. separately appeal from an order that terminated parental rights to their two children, Melanie C. and Donovan C., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Dianna argues the juvenile court should have granted her modification petition; and erred in not applying the benefit exception. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Michael makes the same arguments (his modification petition should have been granted and the benefit exception applied to him as well), and he also contends the children were not adoptable. None of these points is meritorious, so Court affirm.
Comments on In re Melanie C.