In re Jeremy G.
E.G. (the mother) appeals from the courts rulings and orders at the six-month review. She argues the court lacked substantial evidence to conclude that her son should not be returned and that she had received reasonable services. Court find these arguments lack merit and affirm. She also asks this court to review rulings the juvenile court made with regard to one of her children, despite the termination of dependency. Court find any issues regarding this child to be moot.
Comments on In re Jeremy G.