P. v. Harris
Defendant was convicted by jury trial of one felony count of attempting to commit a lewd and lascivious act on a child under 14 following an Internet sting operation. (Pen. Code, 664, 288, subd. (a).[1]) We reject his arguments on appeal that (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to object to inadmissible testimony and (2) the trial court committed reversible error by failing to give two jury instructions. We agree, however, that the probation/conditional sentence order contains an erroneous reference to a booking fee, and Court order that reference to the booking fee be stricken. Court otherwise affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Harris