In re Antonio A.
Tina G. and D.A. appeal the judgment terminating their parental rights over Antonio A. Tina contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by failing to continue the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]and section 388 hearings and erred by finding Antonio adoptable. She also contends the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) failed to send notice as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.). D.A. contends the court erred by failing to find he was Antonio's presumed father. Tina and D.A. join in each others' contentions. Court reverse and remand on the ICWA issue.
Comments on In re Antonio A.