M.A. v. Superior Court
M. A. (mother) challenges the decision of the juvenile court to terminate reunification services and set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]to consider a permanent plan for the minor. Mother argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it found that the reunification services offered to her were reasonable and, also, that return of the minor would create a substantial risk of detriment to them. For the reasons explained below, Court disagree with these contentions and, therefore, deny the petition.
Comments on M.A. v. Superior Court