legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Brumett
Appellant, Brian Lee Brummett, was charged in an information with attempted murder (Pen. Code, 664 & 187, subd. (a), count one),[1]shooting at an occupied vehicle ( 246, count two), assault with a semiautomatic firearm ( 245, subd. (b), count three), brandishing a weapon ( 417, subd. (a)(2), count four), and participation in a criminal street gang ( 186.22, subd. (a), count five). The information included firearm use allegations ( 12022.5, subd. (a), counts one and three) and an additional firearm use allegation ( 12022.53, subd. (b), count one). There were also gang allegations ( 186.22, subd. (b)(1), counts one, two & three; 186.22, subd. (d), count four). Appellant contends the trial court erred under section 654 in failing to stay his conviction on count five for being a member of a criminal street gang because his conviction on count four for brandishing a weapon shared the same criminal intent. Appellant contends that his right to a jury trial was violated because the trial court imposed consecutive sentences. Appellant finally contends, and responded concedes, that there is an error in the abstract of judgment.




Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale