Pacific Ranch Homeowners Assn. v. Murry
Elmer Murry, Jr., appeals from a permanent injunction that directed him to remove a hot tub from the patio of his condominium unit, after the trial court found Pacific Ranch Homeowners Association (Association) had acted reasonably and in good faith when it voted to ban hot tubs on patios. Murry argues he was improperly denied a jury trial, the Association acted unreasonably, and the evidence was insufficient to warrant an injunction. Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on Pacific Ranch Homeowners Assn. v. Murry