In re J.T.
In this dependency proceeding, we affirm the denial of F.T.s (fathers) petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388. (All undesignated statutory citations are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Father showed no changed circumstances and there was no evidence that renewing fathers reunification services would serve the best interest of his three children. court also affirm the termination of fathers parental rights. Contrary to fathers argument, there were no exceptional circumstances warranting a permanent plan other than adoption.
Comments on In re J.T.