P. v. Ramos
Appellant Ralph Zapata Ramos contends the trial court erred when it imposed two five-year enhancements pursuant to Penal Code section 667, subdivision (a)(1) because the prior underlying charges were not brought and tried separately. The People agree. Court reverse and remand.

Comments on P. v. Ramos

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced