In re R.F.
V.F. appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26 ) to her child R.F.[1] Appellants appointed appellate counsel filed a NO ISSUE STATEMENT on October 14, 2008, advising there were no issues that could be raised and therefore no brief would be forthcoming (In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952). Court extended time for appellant to personally file a letter brief, which she has since done.
In her letter brief, appellant writes about the father of her child, challenges the accuracy of information contained in early social worker reports, and finally contends the trial court rejected and ignored her testimony in opposition to terminating her parental rights. Having reviewed the appellate record as summarized below, we conclude appellants letter brief does not contain an arguable claim that the juvenile court committed an error affecting the outcome of this case (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994). Court affirm.
Comments on In re R.F.