legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hodge
Defendant Melvin Lamar Hodge shot his neighbor, Herbert Daire, after defendant, along with his cousin, exchanged words with Daire in the stairwell of their Barstow apartment complex. Defendant was convicted of attempted murder and assault with a firearm. Defendant now contends:
1. Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) No. 3517 did not fully instruct the jury on reasonable doubt as it pertained to the greater and lesser offenses.
2. The trial court did not adequately poll the jury after receiving unnecessary verdict forms on the lesser offense enhancements and erred by refusing to release the jurors names and addresses in order to investigate the additional verdicts for a possible new trial motion.
3. CALCRIM Nos. 603 and 604 deprived him of his due process rights and improperly intruded into the deliberative process. Court conclude that there was no prejudicial error and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale