Hanson v. Aguilera
Plaintiff Gerald Hanson appeals from a judgment of dismissal of his attorney malpractice action against defendants James DeAguilera and James DeAguilera, a Professional Corporation, for failure to post security under Code of Civil Procedure section 391, subdivision (c). Although Hanson concedes the trial court properly found him to be a vexatious litigant, he contends the trial court abused its discretion in setting the amount of security at $100,000.
The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Hanson v. Aguilera