P. v. Jimenez
Defendant and appellant Ernesto Jimenez appeals after he was convicted of burglary, receiving stolen property, possession of burglary tools, and possession of marijuana. His appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], and People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, raising no specific issues on appeal. Defendant has been given the opportunity personally to file a supplemental brief suggesting any issues he wishes to argue; no supplemental brief has been filed. Court have undertaken the required examination of the entire record and discern no arguable issues. Court therefore affirm.
Comments on P. v. Jimenez