legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.R.
Q.D. (mother) appeals from orders of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights to her children, Ke. (born in March 2003) and Ki. (born in March 2005). A.R. (father), the biological father of Ki., appeals from orders of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights to Ki. Ke.s alleged father is not a party to this appeal. Counsel for the children has filed a brief urging us to affirm the juvenile courts orders. Mother contends the juvenile court erred in denying her petition brought under Welfare and Institutions Code[2]section 388. Father joins mothers brief and further contends that if this court finds that mothers parental rights should not have been terminated as to Ki., then fathers parental rights to Ki. should also be restored. Court find no error, and Court affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale