legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Lopez
On May 3, 2007, the Fresno County District Attorney filed an information in superior court. As subsequently amended by interlineation, the information charged appellant as follows:
Count 1carjacking (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a));
Count 2kidnapping ( 207, subd. (a)), with personal use of a firearm ( 12022.53, subd. (b), 12022.5, subd. (a)); Counts 3 and 4possession of a firearm by a felon ( 12021, subd. (a)); Counts 5 and 6possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, 11377, subd. (a)); Count 7dissuading a witness from prosecuting a crime ( 136.1, subd. (b)(1)); and Count 8resisting a peace officer ( 148, subd. (a)(1)). The district attorney specially alleged appellant had sustained three strike priors ( 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)). On May 7, 2007, appellant was arraigned, pleaded not guilty to the substantive counts, and denied the special allegations. On August 23, 2007, jury trial commenced. Appellant contends on appeal (1) that the conviction on count 1, for carjacking, is not supported by substantial evidence, and (2) that his sentence is cruel and unusual punishment. Court disagree with both contentions and will affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale