legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.S.
It was alleged in a juvenile wardship petition filed May 11, 2007, that appellant C.S., a minor, committed a violation of Penal Code section 415.5, subdivision (a) (section 415.5(a)) (disturbing the peace by fighting on school grounds), and following the jurisdiction hearing on August 27, 2007, the court found the allegation true. On November 6, 2007, following the disposition hearing, the court re-adjudged appellant a ward of the court,[1]continued appellant on probation and declared appellants maximum period of physical confinement to be five years three months, based on the instant offense and offenses adjudicated in previous wardship proceedings.
On appeal, appellant contends (1) her adjudication was not supported by substantial evidence and therefore must be reversed; (2) the court erred in setting a maximum period of physical confinement because appellant was placed on probation and not removed from the custody of her parents; and (3) a probation condition imposed by the court relating to the use of alcoholic beverages and illegal or intoxicating substances was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Court reverse.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale