P. v. Reeves
Defendant appeals from a jury verdict finding he was a mentally disordered sex offender (MDSO), and extending his civil commitment for an additional two years. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 6316, et seq.) He argues that instructional error eased the prosecutions burden of proof. Court affirm.

Comments on P. v. Reeves

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced