SikhTemple of Riverside v. Goraya
Dedar Goraya (Goraya) appeals an order enjoining him from coming within 100 yards of the Sikh Temple of Riverside, Inc. (the Temple). (Code Civ. Proc., 527.8.)[1], [2]Goraya makes four contentions: (1) that substantial evidence does not support the trial courts finding that Goraya engaged in a course of conduct that required the issuance of an injunction; (2) that Goraya was not properly served with the temporary restraining order and notice of hearing on the petition for the three-year restraining order; (3) that the temporary restraining order should have been terminated because the Temple did not appear at the hearing on August 2, 2007; and (4) that the trial court erred by not granting Goraya a continuance at the hearing on August 7, 2007. Court affirm the trial courts order.
Comments on SikhTemple of Riverside v. Goraya