P. v. Williams
Steven Williams appeals a judgment after his conviction of selling cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, 11352, subd. (a)), and possession of cocaine base ( 11350, subd. (a)). We conclude that: 1) the trial court gave proper instructions to the jury on the issue of credibility and gave a proper cautionary instruction to correct a statement made by the prosecutor in oral argument, 2) an in camera Pitchess review (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531) by this court is not required, and 3) a probation condition must be modified because it did not include a knowledge requirement. Court order the probation condition modified, but in all other respects Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Williams